Yeah, I see your point, Mr. Manson. Why don't I prepare for you a fro-yo topped with Cap'n Crunch, which is my term for rat poison? They're just words, after all. Oh, and the yogurt isn't really yogurt.
My point is, what is most often referred to as cinÃ©ma vÃ©ritÃ© is not only philosophically diametrically opposed to actual cinÃ©ma vÃ©ritÃ© but (more damningly), it conflates irreconcilable understandings of the nature of reality, God, the universe and everything else!
CinÃ©ma Direct -or- what pretty much everyone erroneously refers to as CinÃ©ma VÃ©ritÃ©
CinÃ©ma Direct is documentary genre that began in QuÃ©bec in 1958. The Quiet Revolution, a cultural assertion of the French-speaking majority under the rule of the Anglo-minority, encouraged the development of a distinct QuÃ©bÃ©cois identity.
As part of this cultural expression, filmmakers sought to re-instill truthfulness in the documentary genre, which, by the 1950s was usually studio-based propaganda rife with dramatizations and mickey mousing. In 1922's Nanook of the North, for example, Nanook (actually an Inuit named Allakariallak living in Inukjuak, Quebec) was built an oversized igloo to share with his wife (who wasn't really his wife) to allow a camera crew and sufficient lighting inside. He was filmed hunting with a harpoon. In the scene, Allakariallak looks in the direction of the camera laughing and smiling memorably. He only knew how to hunt with guns. You can almost hear Robert Flaherty taking him aside and asking, "Could you act... you know... more Eskimo?"
Technological developments, like affordable handheld cameras, allowed for smaller film crews. Practitioners of CinÃ©ma Direct, in an attempt to more honestly capture reality, attempted to hide the film- making process by not interviewing subjects, not dramatizing, not adding non-diagetic music and not using talking heads or narration.
In CinÃ©ma Direct, often directors would spend considerable time with their subjects in the hope that they would become used to the small film crews and eventually ignore them. Personally, whilst I enjoy a good many examples of the genre, I don't find it much closer to achieving objectivity than fiction films. The attempt to hide the filmmaking process is a dishonest technique used universally in fiction films to keep viewers from thinking about the fact that they're watching a film. The impression of non-interference is false-- everyone acts differently in front of a film crew (unless they're unaware of it). One of my favorite examples of this happening in a CinÃ©ma Direct film occurs in Salesman. The salesman is welcomed into a home and (realizing he's being filmed) the homeowner walks over to his stereo and starts blasting what sounds like 101 Strings or Mantovani, clearly showing off his system. Even the idea of being strictly observational is untrue. The subject matter of the film itself and the manner in which the film is edited all present the director's view, not unfiltered reality.
The movement's pioneer was Michel Brault, whose film Les Raquetteurs (1958) marked the beginning of the genre with a short film documenting with as little interference as possible the rituals and ceremonies surrounding a snowshoe competition in Sherbrooke.
Examples of CinÃ©ma Direct
- - Pour la suite du monde - Michel Brault Marcel CarriÃ¨re, Pierre Perrault, 1963
- - Crisis: Behind a Presidential Commitment - Robert Drew 1963
- - The Chair - Robert Drew 1963
- - Meet Marlon Brando - The Maysles Brothers 1966
- - Don't Look Back - D.A. Pennebaker 1967
- - Chiefs - Richard Leacock 1968
- - Salesman - Maysles Brothers 1968
- - Gimme Shelter - The Maysles Brothers 1970
- - Tread - Richard Leacock 1972
CinÃ©ma VÃ©ritÃ©, when distinguished from CinÃ©ma Direct, is usually described as having subtle differences. Those differences strike me as rather profound. The term is a reference to Dziga Vertov's Kino-Pravda series of films from the 1920s and was inspired by the innovations of CinÃ©ma Direct. Sociologist Edgar Morin coined the term in 1960. He wrote, "There are two ways to conceive of the cinema of the Real: the first is to pretend that you can present reality to be seen; the second is to pose the problem of reality. In the same way, there were two ways to conceive cinÃ©ma vÃ©ritÃ©. The first was to pretend that you brought truth. The second was to pose the problem of truth."
In CinÃ©ma VÃ©ritÃ©, no attempt is made at recording events as a fly-on-the-wall. Instead, the filmmakers accept the reality of their own presence. In 1960, Morin and filmmaker Jean Rouch (with aesthetic collaberation from CinÃ©ma Direct's Michel Brault) made Chronique d'un Ã©tÃ©, in which Rouch and Morin discuss on screen whether or not it's possible to act naturally in front of a camera. They then confront their French subjects, asking them if they're happy. At the end, Morin and Rouch review the footage and discuss the level of reality obtained.
In 2003 Robert Drew explained how he saw the difference between CinÃ©ma VÃ©ritÃ© and CinÃ©ma Direct "I had made Primary and a few other films. Then I went to France with Leacock for a conference. I was surprised to see the cinÃ©ma vÃ©ritÃ© filmmakers accosting people on the street with a microphone. My goal was to capture real life without intruding. Between us there was a contradiction. It made no sense. They had a cameraman, a sound man, and about six more--a total of eight men creeping through the scenes. It was a little like the Marx Brothers. My idea was to have one or two people, unobtrusive, capturing the moment."Here's an easy way to distinguish the two schools with example from TV. Cops = CinÃ©ma Direct. Cheaters = CinÃ©ma VÃ©ritÃ©. So why does the term CinÃ©ma VÃ©ritÃ© get applied to every cop drama, Paul Greengrass movie and Quizno's ad, instead of CinÃ©ma Direct? I suspect the appeal of the term "cinÃ©ma vÃ©ritÃ©" -- among its popularizers there's the fact that it has has three times the accents of CinÃ©ma Direct. You know the type, always spelling theater as "theatre" and mispronouncing habanero as habaÃ±ero, using chopsticks in a Thai restaurant.
Become a fan of Eric's Blog on Facebook!