Amoeblog

FREE SEX-CHANGE OPERATIONS IN BRAZIL RAISES QUESTION

WHEN, IF EVER, WILL THE US FOLLOW SUIT?
In compliance with a court order, Brazil’s public health system just announced in the past few days that it will begin providing free sex-change operations . This move came after federal prosecutors from Rio Grande do Sul state had argued that sexual reassignment surgery is covered under a constitutional clause guaranteeing medical care as a basic right.  On August 15th Brazil's 4th Regional Federal Court agreed, saying in its ruling that “from the biomedical perspective, transsexuality can be described as a sexual identity disturbance where individuals need to change their sexual designation or face serious consequences in their lives, including intense suffering, mutilation and suicide.”

According to the Brazilian Health Ministry the government has no intention of appealing this  ruling by a panel of federal judges giving the government 30 days to offer the procedure or face fines of $5,000 a day.  As far as who qualifies for the free sex-change operations the Health Ministry in Brazil said it would be up to local health officials to decide who qualifies for the surgery and what priority it will be given compared with other operations within the public health system. It did state however that  patients must be at least 21 years old and "diagnosed as transsexuals with no other personality disorders and must undergo psychological evaluation for at least two years."

This commendable move by the Brazilian Health Ministry and its government raises the obvious question: When will the US Government implement such a practice here in the United States?  Or rather will it ever do such a thing?  My guess is  probably never or at least not in a long time - based on two main factors: A)  the screwed-up health system already in place in this country which is far from free for anything and B)  the predominant backward attitudes towards sexuality here in the States. Can you imagine the uproar if some US Congress member were to put forward such a proposal?  Media figures like Bill O'Reilly would have a field day as they would undoubtedly spin it into pure sensationalist hysteria about how the hard-working American's tax money would be ripped off from them for sexually deviant purposes.  Ultimately it would result in a lot of discussion, or rather dispute and argument,  but little in concrete, positive and compassionate advances. 

Continue reading
Posted by Billyjam on August 18, 2007 at 07:10pm | Comments (1)

(In which Job clarifies the difference between the gay community and lunch.)



Thursday night, after a sexy and glorious workday at Amoeba Music Hollywood, my boyfriend Corey picked me up and whisked me away to the premiere party for Outfest, held at the historic Orpheum Theatre in downtown LA.

Outfest is LA’s most popular film festival for the GLBT community. (GLBT stands for Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender and should never be confused with the BLT, a popular sandwich.)


Know the difference - Bacon, lettuce, tomato vs. gay actor, Montgomery Clift

"Outfest is the only nonprofit organization dedicated to ensuring that the extensive but threatened LGBT film heritage is preserved. Since the beginning of the struggle for LGBT equality, visionary filmmakers have recorded their lives, challenges and triumphs on film. Outfest is committed to saving, preserving and providing access to that precious, affirming heritage for generations to come." - quote from their website

Put another way, this is a chance to see lots of muscle hunks come to terms with bullies and remakes of “Pretty Woman” that could be called “Pretty Women”.

If I sound cynical, it’s because I am, a bit. But that’s not a reflection of Outfest, rather, a problem I often have with queer cinema. I’ve never been a fan of romantic comedies, and because the definition of gay is indicative of sex, so many gay films are “romantic”.

That’s just one issue I have. On the whole, queer cinema suffers from the same things that mainstream films do. Clichés and what-not. It’s particularly discouraging to see gay films that mimic straight films but, you know, with gay people in ‘em. It’s rare to find a film that is distinctively “gay” outside of the love scenes.

Posted by Job O Brother on July 15, 2007 at 01:08pm | Comments (2)